VALENCE SHELL ELECTRON PAIR REPULSION (VSEPR) THEORY VSEPR THEORY-INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
STRUCTURE OF BERYLLIUM CHLORIDE (BeCl2) VSEPR THEORY-INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
STRUCTURE OF BORON TRICHLORIDE (BcL3) VSEPR THEORY-INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Boron trichloride is a colorless gas with the chemical formula BCl3. The boron atom in this molecule has three bonding pairs of electrons, resulting in a trigonal planar structure with Cl-B-Cl bonds.
STRUCTURE OF WATER (H2O), AMMONIA (NH3) AND METHANE (CH4)
Each of the water, ammonia and methane molecules has four electron pairs around the respective central atom. However, the number of bonding and lone pairs of electrons is different. Methane with four bonding pair of electrons has a tetrahedral geometry (H-C-H bond angle = 109.5°). Ammonia has three bonding pairs and a lone pair of electrons; therefore, the geometry reduces to trigonal pyramidal. Since, the lp-bp repulsion is stronger than the bp-bp repulsion; therefore, H-N-H bond angles of ammonia are contracted to 107°. In case of water, there are two lone pairs and two bonding pairs of electrons which surround the oxygen atom. Therefore, the geometry of molecule reduces to bent shape with H-O-H bond angle of 105°.
STRUCTURE OF NITRATE ANION (NO3-) VSEPR THEORY-INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
The central nitrogen atom bonds to one oxygen atom with a double bond, while it forms single bonds with two other oxygen atoms. Additionally, there are no lone pairs of electrons around the nitrogen atom. Therefore, VSEPR theory predicts that the nitrate ion adopts a trigonal planar geometry.
STRUCTURE OF PHOSPHORUS PENTACHLORIDE (PCL5) VSEPR THEORY-INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
The phosphorus pentachloride (PCl5) molecule contains five bonding pairs of electrons around the phosphorus atom, with no lone pairs on the central atom. Consequently, according to VSEPR theory, this configuration results in a trigonal bipyramidal structure for PCl5.
STRUCTURE OF XENON TETRAFLUORIDE (XeF4)
The Lewis structure of xenon tetrafluoride (XeF4) shows the central xenon atom with four bonding pairs and two lone pairs of electrons. This arrangement changes the expected octahedral geometry to a square planar shape for XeF4.
LIMITATIONS OF VSEPR THEORY
While VSEPR theory provides valuable general predictions about molecular geometries, helping to forecast the shapes of most molecules and ions, it does have limitations. In certain cases, the predicted structures do not align with those determined through physical characterization, as explained below:
- IF7 and TeF7- are isoelectronic with seven bonding pairs around their central atoms, leading VSEPR to predict a pentagonal bipyramidal geometry. However, VSEPR doesn’t account for different bond lengths between axial and equatorial positions. Physical studies show that axial bonds are slightly shorter than equatorial ones, and crystallographic data reveal that TeF7- deviates significantly from the predicted geometry, with equatorial fluorine atoms not in a single plane.
- p-block vs. d-block molecules: While VSEPR theory works well for predicting the geometries of simple p-block molecules, it is not suitable for predicting the structures of d-block compounds.
- Inert pair effect: VSEPR theory does not consider the inert pair effect, making it inaccurate for explaining the structures of molecules involving heavy elements from the periodic table. Crystallographic studies have shown that species like [SeCl6]2-, [TeCl6]2-, and [BrF6]- exhibit regular octahedral geometries, which cannot be justified by VSEPR theory.